Gruve helps organizations validate suspicious activity, establish defensible facts, understand
potential impact, and determine the appropriate next step—whether that means containment,
deeper investigation, evidence preservation, remediation, or readiness improvement.
Validate suspicious activity, scope likely impact, and determine whether escalation is warranted.
Give executives, counsel, insurers, auditors, and boards a clear narrative grounded in reviewed evidence.
Move from uncertainty to containment, remediation, preservation, readiness improvement, or continued monitoring.
Focused digital forensics, incident investigation, and readiness services for high-consequence situations.
Gruve supports organizations when suspicious activity must be validated, sensitive matters require
defensible fact-finding, or incident-response plans need to be tested before a real event. Engagements are
scoped to the client’s question, available evidence, environment, and decision timeline.
AI-assisted speed, defensible evidence collection, and executive-ready
reporting that help organizations investigate incidents with confidence.
Gruve uses AI to accelerate evidence organization, signal clustering, summarization, and report preparation. Investigators validate source evidence, determine significance, and own every conclusion.
DFIR findings must support action. Gruve reports explain what is known, what is not yet known, what evidence supports the conclusion, and what should happen next — in language technical teams, executives, counsel, insurers, and boards can use.
Gruve brings particular depth to macOS-heavy environments, sensitive workplace and executive matters, early incident validation, and focused compromise assessments. Each engagement is scoped around the client’s question and the evidence needed to answer it.
A suspicious alert, unusual login, vendor notice, insurer inquiry, or executive concern needs fast validation.
A board, audit, insurance, M&A, post-change, or customer assurance request requires evidence-backed current-state confidence.
Prompt logs, MCP servers, AI plugins, system prompts, AI identities, and audit trails need compromise-focused review.
An Apple endpoint, executive device, HR/legal-sensitive matter, or evidence preservation issue requires macOS-aware handling.
Your IR plan exists, but Security, Legal, HR, Communications, and executives have not tested how they make decisions together under pressure.
Compromise Validation is a fast, focused engagement for the period between suspicion and full incident declaration. It reviews the most relevant evidence sources to determine whether compromise is substantiated, not substantiated, or requires escalation.
Proactive Assurance is used when there is no declared incident but leadership needs evidence-backed confidence. It reviews priority endpoint, identity, SaaS, cloud, and administrative surfaces for hidden compromise, suspicious behavior, control drift, or policy violations.
A tabletop tests whether people can make decisions under realistic pressure. Gruve uses decision-forcing scenarios to test declaration, escalation, legal involvement, insurer notification, communications, and executive coordination — then documents gaps in an After Action Report.
Yes. Gruve supports macOS evidence preservation, workplace/HR-legal investigation, and security incident investigation for Apple-heavy environments, executive devices, and sensitive matters.
Yes. Gruve supports corporate, civil, regulatory, HR/workplace, and counsel-directed matters. Engagements may include evidence preservation, activity reconstruction, focused device analysis, and defensible reporting. Gruve does not provide criminal-defense or law-enforcement investigative services.
It is a forensic review of deployed AI environments for evidence of abuse, manipulation, unauthorized access, or compromise. Gruve reviews prompt logs, MCP manifests, AI tool configurations, audit trails, system prompts, and supply chain indicators where available.
AI helps accelerate evidence organization, clustering, summarization, pattern review, and reporting preparation. Investigators validate source evidence, determine significance, and own findings and conclusions.
Deliverables vary by service but may include validation briefs, executive summaries, technical findings reports, After Action Reports, evidence summaries, timelines, scope assessments, remediation guidance, readiness roadmaps, or AI-specific IOC recommendations.
Book a complimentary DFIR consultation to assess your incident,
understand the scope, and receive expert guidance on the next steps.