For years, enterprise automation has relied on structured, rule-based systems powered by RPA (Robotic Process Automation), such as financial platforms, HR systems, CRMs (Customer Relationship Management), and IT service tools. These technologies handle critical business functions and ensure businesses function smoothly.
But now, AI agents are disrupting the automation landscape. Agents offer smarter, more adaptive automation that can analyze data in real-time, predict outcomes, and even assist in decision-making.
This evolution raises a key question: Are AI agents truly as capable as they seem? Does their rise signal the end of traditional RPA? Let’s take a closer look.
Traditional enterprise applications are, at their core, rule-based systems. They follow predefined workflows and require structured data and human input for decision-making. Think SAP ERP managing supply chains with military-grade precision or Salesforce CRM tracking each stage of the sales pipeline.
AI agents, on the other hand, can plan and execute actions based on dynamic context without relying on hard rules. AI agents bring intelligent reasoning, real-time analysis, and decision-making capabilities.
For example, Salesforce Agentforce (https://www.salesforce.com/agentforce/) allows sales reps to generate sales pitches, recommend products, and resolve customer issues automatically, almost like a personal assistant built into the CRM. (Want to explore how AI can enhance customer experience? Check out our CX solutions.
Take Glean as another example. Glean is a leader in enterprise AI designed to understand, automate, and augment the way people work. Recently, it introduced an AI agent platform that allows users to build custom workflows, from streamlining HR inquiries to conducting engineering postmortems—all with just a few clicks and no coding required. (Read here to learn about how Gruve partners with Glean.)
So, what use cases are best suited for AI agents? And where does traditional RPA still excel? While AI agents seem powerful, they are not mature enough to cover all business needs, especially in areas requiring high accuracy and secure execution. Here’s a side-by-side comparison:
Takeaway: AI does not replace traditional RPA. The key is knowing where to use AI agents and where to stick with rule-based automation.
To get the most out of AI agents while minimizing risks, enterprises must focus on reliability, security, transparency, data quality, and performance. Here’s how:
Today's AI still makes mistakes, especially in complex scenarios or edge cases. Instead of fully automating critical processes, businesses should integrate human oversight at key checkpoints to review AI-generated outputs and handle exceptions. This approach not only reduces errors and compliance risks but also helps build trust in AI tools before scaling it across the organization.
The more AI agents a company deploys, the harder it becomes to manage them. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang recently noted that IT teams will take on HR-like roles in managing AI agents. Just as employees need training and oversight, AI agents require updated business vocabulary and governance to prevent inefficiencies. Businesses must establish clear guidelines and monitoring systems to keep AI agents working effectively and adapting to changing needs.
AI-powered automation introduces new security challenges that traditional enterprise applications and RPA don’t face, such as data poisoning attacks (where malicious inputs corrupt AI decisions) and adversarial manipulation (tricking AI into misclassifying data). Before AI gets out of control, companies must continuously monitor deployment mythologies and enforce strict access controls.
AI often feels like a black box, and when multiple agents are involved in a process, understanding their decisions becomes even harder. Companies should build tools and pipelines to track what data goes in, what comes out, and why certain decisions are made. This ensures AI-driven actions remain explainable and auditable.
AI is only as good as the data it learns from. If the source data is outdated or biased, AI agents can make poor decisions. Enterprises must establish robust data pipelines and governance policies to prevent low-quality inputs from degrading performance.
AI agents can be expensive to run and slow to respond if not optimized. Keep an eye on infrastructure costs, fine-tune deployments, and use cost-efficient AI models and inference pipelines to avoid unnecessary spending.
The best approach is not choosing AI over RPA. It’s using both. Hybrid automation models allow businesses to combine AI’s adaptability with RPA’s structured execution to maximize efficiency. Connect AI and RPA via an orchestration layer to create smooth handoffs between AI and RPA. For example, AI can classify and extract data from documents, but RPA must validate and process it within predefined compliance rules.
AI agents are changing the way businesses automate, but they are not a one-size-fits-all replacement for traditional enterprise applications. The smartest organizations will be those that blend AI’s intelligence with RPA’s reliability to achieve a scalable, future-proof automation strategy.
Ready to future-proof your automation? Talk to our team today.
Unlock the power of data and technology to drive growth and innovation. Contact us today for a consultation or more information.
